Comments on: Tool Support Should Be Loosely Coupled http://marcus.ahnve.net/2007/12/17/tool-support-should-be-loosely-coupled/ A northern, polar-bears-on-the-streets, view on programming, music etc. from Marcus Ahnve Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:43:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Marcus http://marcus.ahnve.net/2007/12/17/tool-support-should-be-loosely-coupled/comment-page-1/#comment-30671 Marcus Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:04:46 +0000 http://marcus.ahnve.net/2007/12/17/tool-support-should-be-loosely-coupled/#comment-30671 <p>I have completely missed that the Rails community is moving away from Subversion. That would be great. </p> <p>As for example, I suppose you have to read my post in the context of the previous ones on choice and why I am excited about Merb. The quoted post concerns me in that this particular member of the Rails community prefers the comfort of Rails integration over superior tools.</p> I have completely missed that the Rails community is moving away from Subversion. That would be great.

As for example, I suppose you have to read my post in the context of the previous ones on choice and why I am excited about Merb. The quoted post concerns me in that this particular member of the Rails community prefers the comfort of Rails integration over superior tools.

]]> By: crayz http://marcus.ahnve.net/2007/12/17/tool-support-should-be-loosely-coupled/comment-page-1/#comment-30626 crayz Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:32:29 +0000 http://marcus.ahnve.net/2007/12/17/tool-support-should-be-loosely-coupled/#comment-30626 <p>Not sure I'm seeing this, could you give examples? In SCMs, e.g., the Ruby/Rails community seems to be moving quickly towards Git</p> Not sure I’m seeing this, could you give examples? In SCMs, e.g., the Ruby/Rails community seems to be moving quickly towards Git

]]>